2006, e-records and Litigation - Legal Tech Connection

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2006

e-records

Litigation

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

APRIL 22, 2023

If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. The court-appointed the SBA as a receiver and permitted it to marshal Cardinal’s assets and business records. Who covers the expense in responding to it?

e-discovery

e-discovery Court Litigator Litigation

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

For example, when a sound recording of a musical work gets played on Spotify, both the owner of the copyright in the musical work and the owner of copyright in the sound recording (the derivative work) are entitled to royalties for the public performance. 388, 392-93 (2006). Fast-forward three decades. In the first, Sony Corp.

Court

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Stay Connected