Remove 2006 Remove e-discovery Remove Judge
article thumbnail

Section 230 Immunizes Bing’s Search Results–White v. Microsoft

Eric Goldman

A batshit crazy concurrence questions “section 230(c)(1)’s constitutionality as applied to state defamation law” because the Constitution’s Commerce Clause power may not convey “the power to nationalize state common law defamation actions… The internet, and related e-commerce, can certainly be interstate in nature.

article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.” Much of the costs were charges from an e-discovery vendor to collect and search electronically stored information (ESI) , including e-mails relating to Cardinal.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. Although Goldsmith’s lawyers pleaded the discovery rule ( id. Oracle software case. (See See my commentary on that case here.) Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. , 569 (1994).

Court 98
article thumbnail

Five Decisions Illustrate How Section 230 Is Fading Fast

Eric Goldman

Perhaps Facebook should have done a better job articulating this, but the judge was far too eager to disrespect the editorial function. The court’s statement implicates Internet Law Exceptionalism 101, and this judge–who was so thorough in other discussions–oddly chose to ignore this critical question.

Court 105