Remove 2006 Remove Court Remove Law firm
article thumbnail

4 Hispanic Lawyers Who Are Leading Historic Change in Law

Legal Talk Network

This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. She went on to manage a law office in San Antonio, make partner at a civil trial firm, and then open her own mediation practice.

article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

IAALS Honors Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and Commits to Carrying on her Legacy

Legal Tech Monitor

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. A trailblazer in many regards, Justice O’Connor left an indelible legacy on our judicial system: one committed to fairness, equality, and the rule of law over gender or background, and to always seeking consensus, however divisive the issue. In 1981, President Reagan nominated her to the U.S.

Judge 52
article thumbnail

Web Scraping for Me, But Not for Thee (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

Many interpreted this as allowing an affirmative right to scrape public data, even if that was not the correct reading of the law and the reality was always more nuanced. Ten years ago, in web-scraping cases, you’d typically see plaintiffs in scraping cases file 10-15 legal claims, with law firms exploring any legal theory that might stick.

article thumbnail

Pfeifer and Wellen Give an Inside Look at LexisNexis’ AI Sprint (TGIR Ep. 230)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

Law firms will likely accelerate their adoption of AI tools based on rising expectations and demands from corporate legal departments to work more efficiently. The way that I’ve looked at it this year is if you go back, I think to like 2002 to 2006, somewhere around there, when the natural language searching first came out.

Law firm 130
article thumbnail

Pfeifer and Wellen Give an Inside Look at LexisNexis’ AI Sprint (TGIR Ep. 230)

Legal Tech Monitor

Law firms will likely accelerate their adoption of AI tools based on rising expectations and demands from corporate legal departments to work more efficiently. The way that I’ve looked at it this year is if you go back, I think to like 2002 to 2006, somewhere around there, when the natural language searching first came out.

Lawyer 52
article thumbnail

Mental Health Pre-Trial Diversion

The Barrister

Third, the court must determine that the individual’s symptoms can be treated effectively with the proposed plan. 11 Downsides Include: Exploiting the System : Some defense law firms actively market the Mental health Diversion program as a way to avoid criminal prosecution. As more cases in California are diverted under Cal.