2006 Court Judge 
Legal Talk Network
SEPTEMBER 15, 2024
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog
OCTOBER 13, 2023
It also provides a separate discussion on the International Court of Justice , which emerged from the San Francisco Conference as well. The Court consists of 15 judges, who are elected to nine-year terms by the General Assembly and the Security Council. The ICJ serves two main functions.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Eric Goldman
MARCH 7, 2025
The court takes two elements off the table immediately: “Plaintiffs do not contest that MMA was a user of an interactive computer service, nor that MMA received the Kane Email from another information content provider.” Rosenthal (from 2006!). Labana Another Court Says Section 230 Applies to RetweetingHolmok v.
Eric Goldman
MAY 12, 2023
The court agrees with Microsoft. ’…the trial court was correct to grant summary judgment finding Microsoft immune from Mr. But the commerce clause was not intended to nationalize the whole of America law.” ” If it matters, the concurring judge is a DeSantis appointee. 2006); Murawski v.
Legal Tech Monitor
AUGUST 22, 2023
Supreme Court. It would mandate a new “code of conduct” for the highest court and a process for adjudicating violations modeled on the enforcement mechanisms that exist in lower courts. Judges should be mindful that they represent the court at all times and should therefore act with integrity “both on and off the bench.”
Eric Goldman
JANUARY 18, 2024
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
Percipient
APRIL 22, 2023
” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
264 
Let's personalize your content